Standing Conference for Management and Organizational Inquiry

Forum

Angela Hope

Military and Organization/Management Studies 5 Replies

Started by Angela Hope in Uncategorized. Last reply by Wilfred Berendsen Jan 30.

rodolphe Ocler

a little trip in France?? 2 Replies

Started by rodolphe Ocler in Sample Title. Last reply by Wilfred Berendsen Nov. 29, 2009.

Rita A. Durant

Conference site 1 Reply

Started by Rita A. Durant in Sample Title. Last reply by Donna M Carlon Nov. 28, 2009.

Notes

JOCM: Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Change

Call for papers for special issue

 

CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

Continue

Created by Dariusz Jemielniak Sep 29, 2009 at 12:14pm. Last updated by Dariusz Jemielniak Sep. 29, 2009.

TAMARA call: "Restorying Entrepreneurship", closes January 2010

Special Issue on: “Restorying entrepreneurship in a changing world”

Guest Editors: Dr Lorraine Warren and Dr Robert Smith

Continue

Created by Lorraine Warren Aug 5, 2009 at 10:48am. Last updated by Lorraine Warren Sep. 25, 2009.

In the news

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=408061
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/business/People-Lederer-flies-flag-for.5600030.jp Continue

Created by Lorraine Warren Sep 11, 2009 at 4:51am. Last updated by Lorraine Warren Sep. 11, 2009.

New book by S. Magala: The Management of Meaning in Organizations

The Management of Meaning in Organizations
Slawek Magala

'The most helpful GPS system to guide us in my opinion is our Euro-colleague Slawomir Magala’s [Rotterdam School of Management]...new book The Management of Meaning in Organizations.' - Charles Wankel, St. John’s University, New YorkContinue

Created by Dariusz Jemielniak May 3, 2009 at 2:55am. Last updated by Dariusz Jemielniak May. 3, 2009.

TAMARA call: Special Issue on: “Transitional Space” (deadline 1 Sept 2009)

Special Issue on: “Transitional Space”

4/10, 2010

Continue

Created by Dariusz Jemielniak Apr 10, 2009 at 3:40am. Last updated by Dariusz Jemielniak Apr. 10, 2009.

Calls for papers, articles, or else

Welcome! To view all notes, click here. Continue

Created by Dariusz Jemielniak Apr 10, 2009 at 3:38am. Last updated by Dariusz Jemielniak Apr. 10, 2009.

Photos

Loading…

Members

  • Christa Walck
  • Dariusz Jemielniak
  • Kenneth Ehrensal
  • Mammed Bagher
  • marja flory
  • Debra Harkins
  • Diane Skinner
  • Donna M Carlon
  • Anete Mikkala Camille Strand
  • Wilfred Berendsen
  • anscom
  • N. S. Miceli
  • Yvette A. Hyater-Adams
  • Sanjiv Dugal
  • Humayun Rashid
  • Arlene Haddon
 

Standing Conference for Management and Organizational Inquiry

Executive Board

David Boje, Chair

Donna Carlon, Program Co-Chair

Carolyn Gardner, Program Co-Chair

Kenneth Ehrensal, Treasurer and Local Arrangements Chair

Grace Ann Rosile, Member at Large

Alexis Downs, Member at Large


Advisory Board

Dariusz Jemielniak, Webmaster and all things Virtual

Rita Durant, Critical Cultural Perspective

Marja Flory and Lorraine Warren, In a Different Voice

Robin Matthews and Frits Schipper, Philosophical Guidance

Helene Fine, from Theory to Action and Activism

Kenneth Jorgensen, International Perspectives

Slawek Magala, associated journal editors


Save these dates: 14 - 16 April 2011

sc'MOI 2011 (20th Anniversary) Theme: Storytelling, Narrative and Antenarrative: A Celebration of the Contributions of David Boje


Details to Follow in Early April 2010


sc'MOI 2010


Theme: Academic Reflexivity


Keynote Speaker: Dr. Stephen Linstead


University of York (UK)


Dates: Thursday 25 March through Saturday 27 March
Place: Embassy Suites Old Town, Alexandria, Virginia

Registration Information

Fees: Full Rate -- $300 (if paid by 1 March 2010)
$350 (after 1 March 2010)

Graduate Students -- $150

Visa, Mastercard and American Express accepted

Contact Ken Ehrensal -- k.ehrensal@mac.com -- for a registration form and/or a credit card authorization form.



Traveling to sc’MOI

Please note that the Embassy Suites Old Town Alexandria (Virginia) is immediately across the street from the ‘King Street’ station (blue or yellow lines) of the Washington DC Metro system (map: http://www.wmata.com/rail/maps/map.cfm).

By Amtrak from points north: If you are on the NE Corridor Line from Boston or NY, exit the train at “New Carrollton” (Maryland) and change to the Metro Orange Line (this is the end of the line and it only runs towards the District from here). Take the Orange Line to “L’Enfant Plaza” and change for a Yellow line train towards “Huntington”. Exit the train at the “King Street” station. This route is easier than taking the train all the way into the District to Union Station and then traveling out to Alexandria.

By Amtrak from points south: The Alexandria Amtrak station is adjacent to the “King Street” Metro station. Exit the station to the right, turn right on King Street, walk one block and you will see the Embassy Suites across the road to the right (sorry about all the right turns for all you political liberals).

By Air: The Best of the Best: Fly into Washington National Airport (DCA); take the Metro Blue Line (towards Franconia-Springfield) or Yellow Line (towards Huntington) two (2) stops to “King Street”.

Flying into Baltimore-Washington International (BWI): BWI is about 50 miles north of Alexandria. BWI is serviced by both Amtrak and MARC (commuter train). Take the train towards DC. You want to exit at New Carrollton (this is one stop on Amtrak and a short ride on MARC) and change for the Metro. See instructions above for Amtrak from points north.


Flying into Dulles (IAD): Dulles is about 30 miles south of Alexandria. There are several options to get to Alexandria. You can take the Super Shuttle door-to-door at $35 each way. (http://www.washfly.com/super_shuttle.htm) Alternatively, you can take the Washington Flyer coach to the end of the Metro Orange line (“West Falls Church” station) and take the Orange line to “Rosslyn” station and transfer to the Blue line (towards Franconia-Springfield) and exit at King Street. (http://www.metwashairports.com/dulles/809.htm) Alternatively you can take the Metrobus Route 5A to Rosslyn Metro station and change to the Blue line (towards Franconia-Springfield) and exit at King Street. (http://www.metwashairports.com/dulles/809.htm)



Driving and Parking:

The Embassy Suites has a garage that is $24/day with in and out privileges. There are other garages in the area that are a couple of blocks away that may be cheaper. We are checking on that.



ACADEMIC REFLEXIVITY: Oxymoron and Vertigo

Position paper by David M. Boje October 13, 2009


Academic Reflexivity is an oxymoron. Academics are not expected to be reflexive. We are indoctrinated into a non-reflexivity. Yes, there is a reflexive praxis, since Socrates, reinvented by Argyris and Schon, then again by Cunliffe and Shotter.
Our keynote speaker Steven Linstead will have something to say about the ethos of Academic Reflexivity, perhaps its genealogy, and its refusal to stare into the abyss.
Academic Reflexivity has been reinvented by the Academy of Management (AOM) and the AASCB. Their project is to colonize the planet with a set of American academic standards, a normalized global managerialism. Once upon a time, AACSB switched from laundry lists to mission, and now it has morphed again into AOL (Assurance of Learning). The Brits have their version of accreditation, one that results in musical academic chairs, and ever-changing addresses of faculty recruited elsewhere to influence the research stats. And in Australia, its all about doing research the government approves. Each nation does it differently. But AACSB and AOM seek to rule all with AOL.
If ever an academic did ‘reflexivity,’ we would be staring into such an abyss, that vertigo would surely result. I used to teach at UCLA and every dissertation was reflexivity done according to Argyris and Schon, and somehow it has been absorbed by managerialism is one more community of practice. I think it all has to do with too much AACSB, to much AOM.
AACSB is a group of deans turned towards software and hard-core curriculum consulting. Each year I enter everything I write, do, and teach, every event of my life into some AACSB dean’s software for my annual performance review. It spits out a standardized resume of my work for my department head, the necessary review committees, and tabulates all my work and life into the requisite AACSB metrics.
One of their consultants gave us instruction on how to do AOL so AACSB would sign our reaccreditation. When we raise the issue that Heidegger as well as all those in Critical Pedagogy (from Freire to Schor) do not believe that learning is measureable, that outcome assessment displacing input assessment (test scores & such) was weak enough education theory, but to do AOL was preposterous and foolish. What were we told? “To resist AACSB is futile.” Of course, AOL is ridiculous. Just do it! Just create assessments that do not measure anything, and then change the curriculum to reflect the celebration of continuous improvement. And we ask, “Does that lead to standardized pedagogy, with standardized modules.” And the answer is shorter, not really even a word, “dahh!”
If we actually did Academic Reflexivity, then we would be face to face with a mirror. We would look into the mirror, and the mirror would crack, or is it our self that is fragmented into a million pieces.
Ethos, pathos, and logos have collapsed, so that reflexivity is just rhetorical maneuvering to get to the ‘yes’ from the master, AACSB. To be of good character is to be accredited. To be emotionally passionate is OK here and there. To have one logos fits all is a guaranteed ‘yes’ to re-accreditation.
The voice of the academic storyteller has switched off. All reflexivity has been banished by the administrative regime of AACSB and AOL. We are now practicing a pathos well known at Disney, just faculty being smiling robots, saying ‘yes master.’
And Critical Academic Reflexivity would introduce such vertigo, such a horrid image as to crack the mirror and us. We would see Kafka’s cockroach staring back at us in the fragments. Such a metamorphosis, that Academic Reflexivity could never happen anymore.
There is of course Managerial Reflexivity. We can enter a world of fiction, a world where consensus rules, where the administered order is the only logic, the emotional pathos, and the ethos is so very instrumental while appearing at surface to be so magnanimous.
I would offer Dorothy Smith, her standpoint theory as a way of Academic Reflexivity. She follows Marx in looking to material conditions and Garfinkel in developing an ethnomethodology, but this time for academics and their theorizing. See, Myers’ application of Smith’s work to how academic women frame success, and are framed by higher education processes. Academic reflexivity could be about being answerable (in Bakhtinian ethical sense) for ones standpoint. As Nietzsche declares, there is no neutral place to stand.
If our Academic Reflexivity standpoint is on the edge of the abyss, or falling into the abyss while staring back at those who pushed us, or even at our own leap, then we have a vertigo experience. We are dizzy, unsteady, and lightheaded.
I have said that there is some kind of difference between retrospective sensemaking and reflexivity on our now-ness and presentness. I think this has to do with noticing non-linear time shapes, and non-flat spatialities.
I join a long list of scholars who admit to multiple chronicities, simultaneous and interactive to one another (Bakhtin, Bennett, de Certeau, Derrida, Heise, Prigogine & Stengers, and so forth).
Antenarrating means noticing multiple bets on the future, and multiple now-choices before the narrative managerial, administered order of a standardized mechanical time, and a global spatial colonizing occurs as the only antenarrative potentiality. If there is a multiplicity of temporalities interacting with a multiplicity of specialties, then we get more vertigo from such Academic Reflexivity.
It’s not about communities of reflexive practice. I follow Walter Benjamin in declaring the death of the storyteller. Its the end of competencies in sensemaking because the communities where we learned such practices of reflexivity have been splintered by division of labor, by hierarchy, by the administrative order of complies to non-sense reaccreditation. We have communities of reflective practice that are more and more about ‘all resistance is futile.’
If Socrates, Aristotle, Newton or Einstein would engage in Academic Reflexivity after years of regiment in AACSB and AOM table of instructions, they would achieve greatness. It’s not about greatness anymore.
We claim to teach our students reflexive practice, without engaging in it ourselves. I think that is because if we stared in the mirror, our complicity in the university turned into an asylum, into a prison, would be so overwhelming, we would just fall into such an endless abyss, we could not recover.
We who claim to be against the administered order, to be critical management scholars, live a dual life. We work in flatland, in linear time shapes, and develop our illusion we are bringing about some kind of dynamic time-space, some alternate chronotope that is all about non-linear dynamics, about far-from-equilibrium. Perhaps we just repeat standard pedagogical programs, and standard review cycles for our manuscripts, and standard recitals at the podium. We spin the wheel, in the rat’s cage, expecting the cheese to come soon.
As a critical postmodern storyteller, there are multiple plots lines, some plot cycles, and some alternative times shapes. I am wondering about spirals and rhizomes. We are at the mercy of AACSB accreditation and reaccreditation cycles, and cycles of classroom schedules, and cycles conference presenting, and cycles of rejection, and sometimes get into revise and resubmit cycles. Our life is so cyclic, just stage after stage of standard cycles, so fit for training students in the corporate life of quarterly returns.
Multiple spatialities would include Tamara, web, maze, labyrinth, rhizomatic assemblage, cyberspace, and some networks the morph.
There could be a revival of a storytelling practice that admits to multiplicity of chronotopes, to multiple temporal and spatial frames that interplay. This would pull cause and effect apart, making it only relevant in near-to-equilibrium situations. The more complexity and chaos situations of far-from-equilibrium would necessitate this storytelling of multiplicities where chance, coincident and accident are commonplace. Such Academic Reflexivity would crack our time-space consciousness.
For me, I like to contemplate the spiral. I make spiral pens, and art object out of baling wire, off the hay bales, that accumulate in our small horse ranch. A spiral puts ethos, pathos, and logos in different relationship. Deleuze looks at spirals in Differences and Repetition. The spiral repetition is not a cycle. It makes what Bennett calls a ‘swerve.’ For me, swerves are those ‘wow moments’ when our living story twists and turns away from linearity and away from recurrent cycles. A spiral is a non-recursive antenarrative time-space shape…As Heise puts it “the cyclical or spiral patterns of history and the recurrence of archetypes that many modernist texts foreground are designed to resist the linearity and mechanicity of standardized time” (1997: 36).
When Academic Reflexivity can storytell the spirals, we will leave normalization of AOM and AACSB to their linear obsession.
References
Argyris, Chris; & Schon, Donald. 1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. M. Holquiest (ed), trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics.
Cunliffe, Ann L. 2002.Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33 (1): 35-61.
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. Practices in Everyday Life. Translated by Steven F. Rendall. Berkeley/London: University of California Press
Deleuze, Giles. Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. NY: Columbia University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and DifferAnce. London: Routledge & Kean Paul.
Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
Heise, Ursula K. 1997. Chronoschims: Time, Narrative, and Postmodernism. Literature, Culture, Theory 23. Mass: Cambridge University Press.
Linstead, Steven. 2006. The comedy of ethics: The New York fout, the du of care and organizational bystanding. In R. Westwood and C. Rhodes (Eds.) Humour, Work, and Organizaiton. London: Routledge, pp. 203-31.
Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Translated by Robin Postel. Hampton Press, Inc. Cresskill, NJ.
Myers, Martina H. 2009. Institutional Ethnography: How Tenured Academic Women Talk about Success. University of New Mexico doctoral dissertation.
Prigogine, Ilya; & Stengers, Isabelle. 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with nature. Shambhala/Boulder & London: New Science Library.
Shotter, John. 1993. Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through language. London: Sage.
Shotter, John; & Cunliffe, Ann L. 2002. Managersa as practical authors: Everyday conversations for action. In D. Holman and R. Thorpe (Eds.), Management and Language: The manager as Practical author. London: sage, pp. 15-37.
Smith, Dorothy. E. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.


www.scmoi.org is the main address


JOIN THE GENERAL GROUP if you want to follow the email discussion list.


Read about our logo


The older version of the website is located here



The Standing Conference for Management and Organizational Inquiry, Inc.
c/o Kenneth Ehrensal, Treasurer
DF209, Kutztown University
Kutztown, Pennsylvania, 19530, USA
Telephone: +1 610 683 4599
E-mail: Ehrensal@Kutztown.edu



IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER


SCMOI, Inc. neither endorses the products or organizations whose advertisements are placed on this page by Google nor receives direct financial benefit from these advertisements.

Looking for something to read?

The Methods and Meanings of Collaborative Team Research

Team research enables the collection of multiple, sometimes conflicting, stories of migration, family, and belonging. Using common qualitative methods within a team research context can stretch these research techniques in productive and instructive ways and proffer new insight and meaning.Therefore, the authors suggest that team research offers an important avenue for both extending qualitative methods and expanding interpretative lenses. To illustrate these points, the authors draw upon their study of the settlement and migration patterns of East African Shia Ismaili Muslims in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and discuss their experiences with focus group effects, the simultaneous household interview strategy, and postinterview dialogues. The article highlights how these three techniques and effects enacted in the team research context helped the authors explicitly locate contradictions, ambiguities, and paradoxes within the narratives of first- and second-generation Ismailis.

The Liminal Experience: Loss of Extended Self After the Fire

This article explores the traumatic loss of home through an autoethnographic account of the period of disorientation after a residential fire described by Turner as the "betwixt and between" stage of grief. The author explores her experience of a loss of extended self and illustrates in this personal account how technologies in the form of possessions extend the human self. The reflection is guided by McLuhan’s understanding of the extension of the body, Belk’s description of how the self is extended through possessions, and Bachelard’s understanding of the significance of the house. The narrative demonstrates the usefulness of autoethnography in understanding traumatic loss.

The cosmology of accounting in mid 19th-century Thailand

Publication year: 2010
Source: Accounting, Organizations and Society, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 4 March 2010
Nooch, Kuasirikun , Philip, Constable
In recent years it has been increasingly recognised that accounting cannot be fully understood without an appreciation of the social and political contexts in which it operates. Religious values and ethical codes form important aspects of the social and political frameworks of most societies. Using the social theory of Marx, Weber, Foucault and Durkheim, accounting researchers have debated the ways and extent to which accounting has been influenced by religion. By analyzing the indigenous accounts of mid 19th-century Siam/Thailand, this article contributes to this debate by demonstrating how accounting was determined by the interaction of socio-religious, economic and political practice....

The cosmology of accounting in mid 19th-century Thailand

Publication year: 2010
Source: Accounting, Organizations and Society, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 4 March 2010
Nooch, Kuasirikun , Philip, Constable
In recent years it has been increasingly recognised that accounting cannot be fully understood without an appreciation of the social and political contexts in which it operates. Religious values and ethical codes form important aspects of the social and political frameworks of most societies. Using the social theory of Marx, Weber, Foucault and Durkheim, accounting researchers have debated the ways and extent to which accounting has been influenced by religion. By analyzing the indigenous accounts of mid 19th-century Siam/Thailand, this article contributes to this debate by demonstrating how accounting was determined by the interaction of socio-religious, economic and political practice....

Unanticipated consequences of “humanitarian intervention”: The British campaign to abolish the slave trade, 1807–1900

Abstract  
Building on Robert Merton’s theory of unanticipated consequences of purposive action and Charles Tilly’s theory of error correction, the present article presents a stylized narrative about the British campaign to abolish the trading in African slaves, from its beginning in 1807 until the end of the nineteenth century. In the end, this campaign was largely successful, though it required error corrections that had extremely far-reaching consequences. The colonization of Africa was, to a certain extent, a second-degree unanticipated consequence. This case study suggests that three sorts of error correction can be distinguished, namely (a) measures that are taken to facilitate the effective implementation of the purposive action; (b) measures that are taken to minimize unintended consequences, after the purposive action has been carried out; and (c) new purposive actions that widen the objective and are more far-reaching than the original purposive action.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s11186-010-9106-4
  • Authors
    • Marcel van der Linden, International Institute of Social History Amsterdam The Netherlands

Public Sociology or Partisan Sociology? The Curious Case of Whiteness Studies

Abstract  
This paper identifies the common themes in 245-plus refereed articles on whiteness studies that were published in academic journals after 1992 in an attempt to assess the implications of whiteness studies for the discipline of sociology. Of special interest is the relationship between whiteness studies and Michael Burawoy’s call for public sociology. I argue that the emerging field of whiteness studies identifies itself as a public sociology that is infused by the moral vision of critical sociology. Nevertheless, the field does not accept professional sociology as Burawoy defined it. The ontological, epistemological, and soteriological foundations of whiteness studies encourage the field to pander to one segment of the public—the marginalized—and condemn another segment of the public—“privileged whites,” thus rendering impossible a democratic dialogue on one of the most basic social issues of our time. Conflating Western epistemology with whiteness encourages a misreading of American social scientific work on race relations, thus opening the door to a so-called hermeneutics of suspicion. The result is not an innocuous “pop” sociology, but a partisan sociology, whose implications should caution sociologists against an uncritical embracing of public sociology.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s12108-010-9086-x
  • Authors
    • Jack Niemonen, University of South Dakota Department of Anthropology & Sociology 414 E. Clark St. Vermillion SD 57069-2390 USA

Fashion as Methodology: Rewriting the time of women's modernity

Recent feminist scholarship has shown that women’s anteriority to ‘the modern’ — and even to time itself — was a powerful and persistent feature of the temporal imaginary at the height of industrial modernity, from about 1860 to 1940. Neo-Marxist work on the time of modernity, for its part, indicates that the dualistic understanding of temporality that structures the trope of feminine timelessness is marked by instabilities and contradictions. Fashion, I argue, makes apparent these instabilities. Approaching the debates on modern temporality through the lens of fashion adds complexity to theories of women’s positioning vis-à-vis modernity, showing that women were invoked simultaneously as modernity’s antitheses and its exemplars. I suggest that the register of ephemerality advanced by fashion offers a useful framework for understanding the variable visibility of women in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

European Identity between Flows and Places: Insights from Emerging European Landscape Policies

This article is a contribution to the debate on European identity. It explores the emerging field of European landscape policies, clustering around the European Landscape Convention (Council of Europe, 2000) as an interpretative key for representations of Europe as cultural ‘unity in diversity’, a formula that embodies the main institutional and public narrative of the identity of Europe. The article presents results from fieldwork research tracing the ELC’s discursive field, and the spaces for interpretation and action that it has opened up for actors within European networks and projects. It shows that whereas the official narrative may be reducible to a simplistic model of nested identities, from local to European, actors who have become familiar with it use their ‘European identity’ in more complex ways, displacing binary cultural and spatial logics — unity vs. diversity, places vs. flows — that still mostly inform theories of identity.

Framing Globalization and Work: A Research Agenda

Drawing on vignettes of the contested nature of change at work in a context of globalization, this article presents four contending narratives of this relationship. It argues that such frames open up or close down the possibility for actors to envisage the evolution of work and employment. The first two (overdetermined convergence and the crisis of capitalism) limit our understanding of important features of the processes underway. A third (balancing the economic and the social) opens up more space for varied outcomes and social choices, but is faulted for its problematical assumptions about social engineering and institutional trade-offs. A fourth frame focused on actor capacity and power offers the most interesting analytical avenues for the development of research. Four consequences are envisaged for the development of a research agenda: first, a focus on four types of fault line of deep societal change (internationalization of economic relations, the reorganization of production, the gender contract and decent, socially useful and healthy work) and the intersections of these fault lines; second, identifying and tracking the articulations and hierarchies between sources and sites of social regulation; third, studying the decline and revitalization of existing actors and the emergence of new actors and their capacities and power; finally, making research on work and employment matter through values, a proximity to social actors and a normative dialogue with change.

Marx, formal subsumption and the law

Abstract  Recent work rethinking the place of the law in Marxian analysis of capitalist society provides us with a foundation for a renewed look at the labor process. Drawing on this literature, which emphasizes the materiality of institutions through which labor is exploited, and returning to Marx’s discussion of formal subsumption in Capital, I argue that the law was central for subordinating labor. I then present three case studies from industries in Victorian England to demonstrate the diverse ways in which law was implicated in formal subsumption. The case studies focus on the ways in which capitalists used master and servant law, the key law governing the workplace, to subordinate labor. I conclude by considering how these cases provoke us to consider the materiality of the law in labor relations more broadly, and such questions might be pursued in developing capitalist economies such as China.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s11186-009-9101-9
  • Authors
    • Marc W. Steinberg, Smith College Northampton MA 01063 USA
  • Journal Volume Volume 39

'The Right to Choose or Choosing What's Right? Women's Conceptualizations of Work and Life Choices in Contemporary Russia'

The resulting social and economic transformations of marketization and democratization have had a significant impact on the employment terrain of post-socialist Russia. This has had particular effects on the forms and structures of work available for women. Our article argues that as a result of these social and economic transformations, the metaphor of 'choice' inherent in current theoretical approaches to the study of women at work in western contexts can also be adapted to the post-socialist context. Building on existing research on women and work in the UK and in Russia, we seek to provide new insights into Russian women's own understandings of work and non-work choices grounded in an analysis of women's use of rights discourses. Drawing on in-depth interview data with 49 women living in the provincial Russian city of Ul'ianovsk, we explore constructions of work in relation to narratives of discrimination; as a means of 'samorealizatsiia', and as 'choice' reflecting the continuing inseparability of public and private roles for women. Situating our work in wider global debates affecting the gendered nature of employment, the examination of the use of rights discourses not only highlights the multiple ways in which women perceive their choices about work but also offers an alternative conceptual framework.

'Senseless' violence: Making sense of murder

This article, based on an ethnographic study conducted over a three-year period in an impoverished, predominately African American and Latino neighborhood in the northeastern US, describes how a drug gang narrative was created by the police and prosecutors to explain a series of unsolved murders. The narrative that the authorities constructed retroactively tied these unrelated crimes together by connecting them to neighborhood drug dealers whom they construed as a gang. Through this narrative, the authorities were able to prosecute all the cases in sequence and deploy a series of defendants and witnesses to win convictions — even in cases where they had little evidence. Murders like these are typically described by law enforcement agencies and the media as ‘senseless’ acts of ‘random violence’. When examined with ethnographic detail, however, these acts of murder turn out to have motives that community members understand but have nothing to do with gang activity.

Narrative of a Worker: Havatzelet Ingbar and the Atzmaout Textile Factory Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, 2000

This article is about the struggle of a group of marginalized women who stood up for their rights, providing a dramatic lesson of courage and self-empowerment. These women, who were workers in a textile factory in the remote town of Mitzpe Ramon in Israel, became its managers and owners. This article documents their groundbreaking experience and investigates some of the problems that arose during this period. The conclusion of this research is that the main knowledge and experience that is required from workers who become managers overnight is political rather than professional, economic or commercial. Moreover, the women learned that political knowledge cannot be replaced by accelerated courses in management, marketing and business administration. Finally, the women realized that the men with whom they interacted desired to see them return to the sewing machines as unprofessional workers, in traditional female roles.

Comment on: risky subjects: narrative, literary testimonio and legal testimony by Shonna Trinch

Abstract  Vicente Lecuna comments on the Shonna Trinch's contribution about what it might be called the destructive power of narrative. Trinch’s contribution shows us that a power gaining process involves a process of destruction, that constructing an (dialectical) argument in favor of the cause of a subaltern group or class is risky, and could end in a power loss for the witness of violence and narrator of her experience.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s10624-009-9143-4
  • Authors
    • Vicente Lecuna, de la Universidad Central de Venezuela Profesor Asociado de la Escuela de Letras Caracas Venezuela

From ancestral conflicts to local empowerment: two narratives from a Nepalese community

Abstract  This article concerns the first region that the Maoists declared to be their base area, in the western part of Nepal. It examines how the 10 years of insurrection are reconstructed through two narratives by non-aligned villagers from the same community. These accounts concern two different phases of the conflict. In the first account, the violent irruption of the security forces into the village turned a spotlight on the structural features and historical conditions which made the community vulnerable to the outside intervention, whether by the rebels or by the state. The second narrative illustrates the obverse side of the same community: its capacity to stand up to oppression on the occasion of a Maoist ban on a sacrifice to the local god. The juxtaposition of the two narratives reveals a process of political maturation characterised by a critical analysis of the past and a nascent confidence in the expression of needs and rights.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s10624-009-9136-3
  • Authors
    • Anne de Sales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Laboratoire d’ethnologie et de sociologie comparative)-Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense Paris France
  • Journal Volume Volume 33

Reversals of fortune: path dependency, problem solving, and temporal cases

Abstract  Historical reversals highlight a basic methodological problem: is it possible to treat two successive periods both as independent cases to compare for causal analysis and as parts of a single historical sequence? I argue that one strategy for doing so, using models of path dependency, imposes serious limits on explanation. An alternative model which treats successive periods as contrasting solutions for recurrent problems offers two advantages. First, it more effectively combines analytical comparisons of different periods with narratives of causal sequences spanning two or more periods. Second, it better integrates scholarly accounts of historical reversals with actors’ own narratives of the past.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s11186-009-9098-0
  • Authors
    • Jeffrey Haydu, University of California, San Diego La Jolla CA USA
  • Journal Volume Volume 39

Public Sociology: Working at the Interstices

Abstract  The article examines recent debates surrounding public sociology in the context of a UK based Department of Applied Social Sciences. Three areas of work within the department form the focus of the article: violence against women and children; community-based oral history projects and health ethics teaching. The article draws on Micheal Burawoy’s typology comprising public, policy, professional and critical sociology, and argues that much of the work described in the case studies more often lies somewhere in between, in the interstices, rather than within one or other of the four types. The result is not without its tensions and dilemmas, some of which are identified and explored, notably those arising from attempts to appeal to diverse audiences and meet the sometimes conflicting expectations of each.
  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s12108-009-9080-3
  • Authors
    • John Gabriel, London Metropolitan University London UK
    • Jenny Harding, London Metropolitan University London UK
    • Peter Hodgkinson, London Metropolitan University London UK
    • Liz Kelly, London Metropolitan University London UK
    • Alya Khan, London Metropolitan University London UK
  • Journal Volume Volume 40

A little info about our visitors

free counters
 
 

Badge

Loading…

Latest Activity

Christa Walck and Mammed Bagher joined Standing Conference for Management and Organizational Inquiry
5 hours ago
on Saturday
Debra Harkins Looking for a program schedule for 2010 conference please
on Saturday
Debra Harkins is now a member of Standing Conference for Management and Organizational Inquiry
on Saturday
Next Ifsam conference in France
March 3
N. S. Miceli is now a member of Standing Conference for Management and Organizational Inquiry
February 23
Sanjiv Dugal might attend Kenneth Ehrensal's event
sc'MOI 2010 at Alexandria, Virginia
March 25, 2010 to March 27, 2010
Theme: Academic Reflexivity Keynote Speaker: Steve Linstead
February 21
sc'MOI 2010 at Alexandria, Virginia
March 25, 2010 to March 27, 2010
Theme: Academic Reflexivity Keynote Speaker: Steve Linstead
February 21
Yvette A. Hyater-Adams updated their profile photo
February 21
I will be in DC on the 27th and may drop by to meet some of the people there.
February 20
sc'MOI 2010 at Alexandria, Virginia
March 25, 2010 to March 27, 2010
Theme: Academic Reflexivity Keynote Speaker: Steve Linstead
February 20
This is the general SC'MOI interest group - all members are strongly encouraged to join. All general information and discussions will start here.
February 19
Rick Herder updated their profile photo
February 19
sc'MOI 2010 at Alexandria, Virginia
March 25, 2010 to March 27, 2010
Theme: Academic Reflexivity Keynote Speaker: Steve Linstead
February 16
hi, thanks for your kind comment - I took this shot when I was in Vegas in 2008 - even though I don't like post-processing photos, here leaving just the flag in full colors seemed adequate.
February 14
Carolyn Gardner updated their profile
February 14
 

© 2010   Created by Dariusz Jemielniak on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service